DD, Track & Burn.

"RT" (rt-p) 12/26/2016 at 16:15 • Filed to: DD TRACK BURN, GIULIA, 2002, 99

3

22

The year is 1968, and you have three small sports saloons to choose from.

DD, Track & Burn. Go!

The Alfa Romeo Giulia 1600 S, 94BHP 1.6 I4.

The BMW 2002, 98BHP 2.0 I4.

The Saab 99, 86BHP 1.7 I4.

Note that none of these cars are the ‘Turbo’ or ‘GT’ versions, just the stock mid-range models available at the time.

The Alfa is the driver’s choice, while the BMW has power on its side and the Saab is the most refined car here. Once again, you choose.

S65 > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:19

1

This could be the perfect garage, mainly beacuse i cannot choose

Nick Has an Exocet > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:20

0

2002. Just has all the looks. The alfa is great too but it looks just a little too budgety

The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:21

0

DD: Alfa

Track: BMW

Burn: Saab

Bman76 (hates WS6 hoods, is on his phone and has 4 burners now) > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:23

1

DD the Saab, because style

Track the 2002

Burn the Alfa, that Giulia is my least favorite Alfa.

BvdV - The Dutch Engineer > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:24

8

DD: Alfa

Track: BMW

Rally: Saab

66671 - 200 [METRIC] my dash > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:27

0

Not too crazy about that specific alfa, so I’ll go dd the saab and track the BMW. 2 door life yo.

dogisbadob > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:34

0

DD Saab

Track BMW

Burn Alfa

Spridget > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:35

0

DD: Saab

Track: BMW

Burn: Alfa

LongbowMkII > RT 12/26/2016 at 16:57

0

Isn’t the 99 a V4?

Chuck 2(O=[][]=O)2 > RT 12/26/2016 at 17:27

0

DD: Alfa

Track: 2002

Burn: the Saab story

pip bip - choose Corrour > BvdV - The Dutch Engineer 12/26/2016 at 17:46

1

^^this.

RacinBob > RT 12/26/2016 at 18:44

1

Why get a 1.6 Giulia when you could get the 1750 Berlina. The Berlina first released in ‘68 is a far more substantial car. It has the most hp - 116 Hp, Also has a 5 spd transmission wheras the BMW had a 4 speed. The Berlina was a far advanced car for ‘68. I actually owned a ‘69 for about 5 years identical to the below.

JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t > RT 12/26/2016 at 18:46

0

dd saab

track Alfa

also track BMW, but burn if required

Berang > RT 12/26/2016 at 18:59

2

You won’t believe this list of cars where the SAAB is the most reliable

Nimbus The Legend - Riding on air like a cloud > BvdV - The Dutch Engineer 12/27/2016 at 17:44

1

THIS. EXACTLY.

RT > RacinBob 12/29/2016 at 02:41

1

Absolutely, I’d say it even looks better too.

Simple reason why I didn’t include it was because it would outclass the other cars.

RT > Bman76 (hates WS6 hoods, is on his phone and has 4 burners now) 12/29/2016 at 02:45

0

Worst Alfa?

Enter the Arna. Featuring Japanese styling and Italian reliability.

Truly a match made in heaven (if it was the other way round).

RT > LongbowMkII 12/29/2016 at 02:47

1

Nope, it was the 96 which ran V4 engines. The 99 had a (slant) inline 4.

RacinBob > RT 12/29/2016 at 08:12

1

The alfa’s are the odd duck of the collector car era. The sedans and coupes are worth more than the convertibles.

Bman76 (hates WS6 hoods, is on his phone and has 4 burners now) > RT 12/29/2016 at 08:42

0

Meh, looks like every other box, but sharper

RT > Bman76 (hates WS6 hoods, is on his phone and has 4 burners now) 12/29/2016 at 08:46

0

But underneath it’s a Datsun Cherry but with its main asset (reliability) completely removed. So, a marriage of dull and unusable.

Seriously, this was probably their biggest failure.

Amoore100 > BvdV - The Dutch Engineer 01/07/2017 at 14:10

1

Wrong. DD the Bimmer, it’s infinitely more reliable. Track the Alfa, it is race-bred after all.